Brady

Brady v. Kelly

Good Law
52 Cal. 371
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1877No. 5048California263 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

The liens were enforced under the Statute of 1862, p. 391, and the Act of 1863, p. 525. The proceedings are wholly in rem against the lots for the specific amounts assessed against each, and as there is no contract between the plaintiff and defendant in reference to either piece of land, it is difficult to imagine upon what principle the joinder of action can be sustained.

It is apparent from the provisions of secs. 8, 9, 10,11, and 13 of the acts in question that the assessment on each lot, so separately assessed and numbered on the diagram, constitutes a single and separate cause of action; and separate judgments should run for the specific amount of the assessment against the specific lot so assessed, in specie, and none other.

These causes of action arise by operation of law only, and are not covered by the provisions of sec. 427, allowing actions arising upon contract to be joined in one complaint.

Robert Y. Hayne, also for the Appellant.

G. H. Parker, for Respondent.

Where two or more lots are assessed for the expenses of work on a street, each lot is chargeable only with the amount assessed upon it, and not for the amount assessed against another lot, and in enforcing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.