DORN

DORN v. HOWE

Good Law
52 Cal. 630
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1878No. 5490California1,319 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

The action is' ejectment; the plaintiff claiming under an execution sale; the defendant claiming that the property was his homestead. The Court filed findings, and the appeal is solely upon the judgment-roll.

The following facts are shown by the findings:

*632

2. The homestead so recorded described the premises represented on said diagram by lots A and P, and so much of Gabilan Street as is inclosed in dotted lines, and lies immediately north of said lots A and P. At the time of recording said homestead, said Howe was residing in a house located upon what is now Gabilan Street, and at the place represented upon said diagram as “ _l_ .”

3. In the month of July, 1874, the authorities of Salinas City were desirous of opening Gabilan Street and of removing therefrom the house and buildings of the defendant Howe; and arrangements were made between said authorities, and other parties acting with them, by which Howe was to receive a deed to lots B and O, and was to remove his buildings from the site of said Gabilan Street.

*633 4. In pursuance of said agreement, Howe executed and released to said City of Salinas all his claim to the site of said (¡rabilan Street, and further agreed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.