City of Stockton v. Clark
53 Cal. 82
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1878No. 6033California59 words
lead Opinion
The notice inviting sealed proposals did not refer to a diagram and specifications of the proposed work, as required by the twenty-seventh section of the Act of March 27th, 1872, to reincorporate the City of Stockton, and for that reason the proceedings are invalid, and the defendant’s property did not become liable for the assessment.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.