People ex rel. Murphy v. Shippee, McKee & Co.

Good Law
53 Cal. 675
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1879No. 6172California355 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

The first section of the act under which the present action— in the nature of' a qui tam action—was brought, reads, as follows : “ Whenever the Assessor assesses any live-stock, he must demand of the person who gives him a list thereof a statement under oath showing: First—whether such stock, or any part thereof, will, during the year for which such assessment is being made, be moved to another county for pasturage, and if such removal is to be made; second—the county to which such stock will be taken; and third—the number, kind, and value thereof; provided, that should such person, at the time of assessment, not have determined to remove such stock, and afterwards should make such removal, it shall be lawful for him to make the statement to the Assessor of the county from which such stock was removed, as in this section provided, through the United States mail.” (Stats. 1878-4, p. 376.)

The proviso is to the effect that' if the owner of any livestock shall determine to remove the same to another county after the assessment is made, he may make to the Assessor, through the United States mail, the statement which he is required to make at the time of the assessment on the demand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.