Shay

Shay v. McNamara

Good Law
54 Cal. 169
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1880No. 5,870California1,557 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Departmentross, J.

Thomas C. and J ohanna J ohnson were married October 24th, 1858. On the 10th of January, 1866, the lot of land in con *172 troversy was conveyed to Thomas—the consideration therefor being paid out of their common property. On the next day Johnson and wife united in the execution of a mortgage on the lot to the California Building and Loan Society, to secure the payment of a certain sum of money. The money not having been paid, an action was afterward commenced in the Twelfth District Court to foreclose the mortgage, to which action Johnson and wife were made parties defendant; and such proceedings were had in that action, that- on the 22nd of March, 1872, a decree of foreclosure, in the usual form, was duly entered. Under this decree the lot in question was sold by the Sheriff on May 17th, 1872, to one Michael J. Kelly, who made the purchase at the verbal request of, and for, Johnson and wife. The purchase-money was advanced by Kelly out of his own funds at the request of, and for, Johnson and wife, and the money so advanced is still due and owing to him from them. On the day of sale the Sheriff, at the request of Michael, executed to his brother, Martin Kelly, a certificate of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.