Estate of Brooks

Good Law
54 Cal. 471
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1880No. 6,058California1,443 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Departmentsharpstein, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the Probate Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing to set aside the will of the decedent after it had been admitted to probate. The case comes here upon the judgment roll, including a bill of exceptions. There was a section or paragraph in the petition of the contestant, which read as follows : “That deceased was not free from fraud at the time of the execution of said instrument. For that it was the will and desire of the deceased that his estate should be distributed, after his decease, differently than as named in said instrument, and that in executing said instrument he made and declared as a part thereof, certain verbal bequests or legacies in favor of petitioner and divers other persons, (and conferring benefits not conferred by said instrument) and charging the same on said Reid as executor ; but at said Reid’s request, omitted to note them on said instrument, because of the promises of said Reid to pay them, which promises were made without any intention of performing them on the part of said Reid.” This was demurred to on the *473 grounds, as stated in the demurrer, that it did not “ state facts sufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.