Harding

Harding v. Minear

Good Law
54 Cal. 502
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1880No. 5,981California1,751 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Departmentmckee, J.

Property of the defendant was taken by a writ of attachment issued in this action at the commencement thereof, and upon the defendant giving an undertaking with sureties, as required by § 555 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the attachment was discharged and the property released.

More than four months after the commencement of the action, the defendant instituted proceedings in bankruptcy; and when he had received his certificate of discharge, he applied to the Court below in this action for leave to file a supplemental answer, setting up his discharge in bankruptcy as a bar to the further prosecution of the action. The Court denied the motion, tried the case on the issue joined by the complaint and answer on file, and gave judgment against the defendant; from which the defendant appeals, and assigns as error the action of the Court in denying his motion to file the supplemental answer.

Section 464 of the Code of Civil Procedure declares that the plaintiff and defendant respectively may be allowed, on motion, to make a supplemental complaint or answer, alleging facts ma *505 terial to the case occurring after the former complaint or answer. Construing the section of the New York…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.