Thomas

Thomas v. Rock Island G. & S. Mining Co.

Good Law
54 Cal. 578
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1880No. 6,386California269 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Departmentfrombench, J.

On the 5th of April, 1875, the plaintiff became assignee of one-half of whatever judgment might be recovered in an action, wherein D. Calderwood was plaintiff, and The Bock Island Gold and Silver Mining Company was defendant. Judgment was rendered against the defendant on the 29th of December, 1876. On the 80th of April, 1877, satisfaction of the judgment was entered by order of the Court in which the action was pending, without notice to the judgment creditor, or his assignee. *579 The latter brought the action in hand to set aside the order and entry of satisfaction, and for a judgment for his interest in that judgment, and damages, and costs. There is no averment in the complaint that the judgment debtor agreed to or ratified the assignment. Treating the action as an action at law, for the recovery of a money judgment, it cannot be maintained for want of such an averment; for such an action cannot be sustained by the assignee of part of an entire demand, without the express agreement or distinct ratification of the judgment debtor. (Grain v. Aldrich, 38 Cal. 514 .) If the judgment debtor assents, the assignee may sue. (McEwen v. Johnson, 9 Id. 250.) But an entire demand cannot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.