Manly

Manly v. Howlett

Good Law
55 Cal. 94
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1880No. 6,762California973 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Myrick, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover the possession of two lots of land situate in Bakersfield, Kern County, together with rents and profits. Plaintiff alleges that on the 11th of December, 1878, he was, has been ever since, and is, the owner, and is entitled to the possession of the lots, and that on that day defendants were, since have been, and are, in the adverse, wrongful, and exclusive possession of the lots. The answer of defendant Howlett denies the ownership of plaintiff, admits his own possession, alleges that he is lawfully in possession, denies the damage and the value of the rents and profits to be $100 per month, and denies every other allegation of the complaint. Defendant alleges that plaintiff’s cause of action is barred by §§ 318 and 319 Code of Civil Procedure, and that he (Howlett) is the owner, and has been in the open, notorious, and exclusive possession, under claim of title, exclusive of every other right, ever since November, 1871, and that he has paid all taxes.

The Court filed its findings of fact as follows:

Upon these findings judgment went for defendant. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and plaintiff appealed.

Without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.