Morrison

De Noon v. Morrison

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 658·83 Cal. 163·23 P. 374
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1890No. 13435California915 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

— Action to recover the possession of the Gordon placer mine, in Nevada County. Trial by jury, verdict and judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial made and denied, and defendants appeal from both the judgment and order.

One of the grounds of motion for new trial was that the evidence was insufficient to justify the verdict. This point is incidentally discussed on the appeal, but it is difficult to determine whether appellants still rely upon that ground or not. We have, however, examined the evidence, and find that there is some evidence to support the verdict upon every issue of fact involved in the case. Under the well-established rule of this court, the verdict will not therefore be disturbed on that ground.

Defendants claim the mining ground under a relocation authorized, as they claim, by a failure of plaintiff to do the required assessment work for the year 1888. No work was done within the lines of the Gordon claim in that year, but the plaintiff claimed to be the owner, and was in possession, of two or more adjoining mining claims, of which the Gordon was one. Of this claim she proved regular location and transfer to herself, and performance of the requisite…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.