Anthony

Anthony v. Jillson

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 682·83 Cal. 296·23 P. 419
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 1, 1890No. 12665California1,915 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hayne, J.

This was an action to determine the right to a patent to certain placer-mining ground. The defendants applied for a patent to a tract called the Rough Diamond mine. The plaintiffs claimed a tract of thirty acres, which overlapped a corner of the defendants’ claim to the extent of 7.44 acres. This latter piece is the one in controversy. An adverse claim was filed by the plaintiffs; and thereupon such proceedings were had that the present action was brought under section 2326 of the Revised Statutes to determine the validity of the respective claims. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.

1. The plaintiffs’ mine is made up of two claims,— one of twenty acres, alleged to have been located by Severino Gobbi in 1878, and the other of ten acres, alleged to have been located by the plaintiff Frank Anthony in 1885.

In relation to the Gobbi claim, the court found as follows: “That on December 6, 1878, one Severino Gobbi, a foreigner, sought to locate a placer-mining claim by posting on the premises a notice claiming in his own name twenty acres of ground situated in Chili Gulch *298 mining district, in said county and state, said notice containing no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.