In re the Disbarment of Luce

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 683·83 Cal. 303·23 P. 350
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 1, 1890No. 20534California5,220 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fox, J.

This is an application made and filed by August Heilbronner .for the disbarment of the above-named defendants, composing the law firm of Luce, McDonald & Torrance, attorneys at San Diego. The record is very voluminous, consisting of some eight hundred pages of testimony and about three hundred pages of printed argument. A careful examination of the entire matter reveals the fact that the proceeding is one of many instituted under both the civil and the criminal law in the course of a bitter contest between Heilbronner, a creditor, and K. C. Naylor of San Diego, an insolvent debtor. Very much of the evidence introduced, and of the argument made, has no relation to this case, except as by it it is attempted to show that Naylor was guilty of divers frauds, or attempted frauds, to avoid a just settlement with his creditors, and that these defendants, his attorneys, were cognizant of and active participators in those attempted frauds.

Naylor is not on trial in this proceeding, and there *305 would be a manifest impropriety in our discussing the question of his guilt or innocence at this time. The very nature of the case requires that we should refer to some of his transactions, but it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.