Stephens v.Parrish

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 726·83 Cal. 561·23 P. 797
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 16, 1890No. 13505California258 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fox, J.

The only point made on this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the verification of the complaint. It reads as follows-: —

Section 446 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that “where a pleading is verified, it must be by the affidavit of a 'party, unless the parties are absent from the county where the attorney resides, or from some cause unable to verify it, or the facts are within the knowledge of his attorney or other person verifying the same. When the pleading is verified by the attorney, or any other person except one of the parties, he must set forth in the affidavit the reasons why it is not made by one of the parties.”

The verification in this case is made by the attorney, and distinctly sets forth the first of the conditions which authorize the making of it by some person other than a party,—that the plaintiffs are absent from the county in which the attorney resides. This is the only one of the conditions under which the law excuses the making of the verification by a party that is given in the affidavit, and is alone sufficient for the purpose. No additional force could be given to it by adding that it is for that reason that the verification is made by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.