Moyle

Moyle v. M. Landers's Administrators

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 732·83 Cal. 579·23 P. 798
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 26, 1890No. 11906California447 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fox, J.

— This is a bill in equity, brought by two stockholders of the defendant the Andes Silver Mining Company, against the directors of said company, and certain others, for an accounting, and the recovery, for the benefit of the company, of moneys of the corporation alleged to have been fraudulently misappropriated by the other defendants. The judgment is on demurrer to the fourth amended complaint, from which the plaintiffs appeal.

The complaint is a model of obscurity. If it were again amended, and carefully pruned of much of its verbiage in the way of recital and repetition, and reduced to about one third its present volume, it would be much more intelligible, and probably would not then invite demurrer; at least, it would not be as likely to induce a sustaining of the demurrer.

A careful analysis of the complaint, however, shows that each of the two counts thereof contains allegations of fact sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of the company against the other defendants; that the plaintiffs are, and have been during all the times mentioned in the complaint, stockholders in the corporation; that the facts and circumstances are such as would make it useless to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.