Havemeyer

Havemeyer v. Superior Court

Caution
1890 Cal. LEXIS 813·84 Cal. 327·24 P. 121
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 9, 1890No. 13709California19,340 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beatty, J.

This is an original application for a writ of prohibition to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, department No. 6, William T. Wallace, judge, commanding and directing said court and judge, and the receiver of said court, Patrick Beddy, Esq., to desist and refrain from proceeding or acting upon or in pursuance of a certain order appointing said receiver.

The importance of the case, not only as regards the interests at stake, hut also in respect to the questions of law and practice which it involves, will justify, if it does not require, a somewhat detailed statement of the facts out of which it arises.

It appears that in the month of November, 1888, the people of the state of California, on the relation of the attorney-general, commenced an action in said superior court against the American Sugar Befinery Company, a California corporation, for the purpose of forfeiting its charter. The corporation appeared and answered the complaint, and after trial the judgment of said superior court was pronounced, declaring the forfeiture and imposing upon the corporation defendant a fine of five thousand dollars and costs of suit.

The judgment was rendered January 8,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.