Landers

Landers v. Lawler

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 839·84 Cal. 547·24 P. 307
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 13, 1890No. 13680California739 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fox, J.

An alternative writ of mandate was issued out of this court, commanding the respondent to settle, *548 allow, and certify a bill of exceptions proposed on behalf of defendants in the above-entitled cause, or show cause before this court why he did not do so. The judge answers, and for cause shows that no proposed bill of exceptions has ever been presented to him for settlement and allowance.

The paper filed here, denominated a petition for the writ, upon examination appears to be an affidavit, with venue laid in the city and county of San Francisco, concluding with a prayer that a writ of mandate be issued, commanding the respondent to certify and allow a certain bill of exceptions, a copy of which is thereto annexed, or show cause before the supreme court of the state of California why he has not done so, etc. It is not entitled, either in its heading, body, or indorsement, or elsewhere, in this or any other court, and is not addressed to this or anj'' other court, nor does it appear out of what court it is desired that the writ shall issue.

Such a paper ought not to have been filed in this court, and it was an inadvertence to have issued any writ or process upon it. It is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.