Beamer

Beamer v. Freeman

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 841·84 Cal. 554·24 P. 169
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 14, 1890No. 13260California1,470 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gibson, J.

Action of replevin. Judgment passed for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.

November 4, 1882, Jeans executed and delivered to defendant a chattel mortgage of a portable steam-engine then in Yolo County, to secure the payment of a promissory note for $1,150. This mortgage was not recorded until August 13, 1886, when it was placed of record in Yolo County, and on the sixteenth day of the same *556 month it was recorded in San Joaquin County, Jeans having on the 1st of the same month, in the same year, removed the engine to the latter county.

August 11, 1886, Baker & Hamilton, creditors of Jeans, attached the engine in San Joaquin County, Jeans having retained the possession of it until that time. On the 20th of the same month, nine days after the attachment was levied, Jeans was adjudged an insolvent debtor, and the plaintiff was by his creditors elected as his assignee; and after having qualified as such, the clerk of the superior court of Yolo County, as required by law, executed and delivered to plaintiff an assignment of all the property of the insolvent debtor, Jeans. Thereupon the sheriff of San Joaquin County, who held the engine under the attachment levy, already…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.