More

More v. Calkins

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 892·85 Cal. 177·24 P. 729
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 1, 1890No. 13565California4,497 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

This appeal is from a final judgment for defendant on general demurrer to the complaint, and the questions for decision relate to the sufficiency of the complaint as against a general demurrer.

A. S. More, having commenced the action in his lifetime, died pending a demurrer to his complaint. After substitution of his administrator, Thomas R. More, as plaintiff, the demurrer was sustained, and the administrator filed an amended complaint, a general demurrer to which was also sustained; and it is the sufficiency of this amended complaint which is in question here.

After averring the death of the original plaintiff and the substitution of the administrator, the amended complaint proceeds as follows: —

“ 2. That heretofore, to wit, on the seventh day of April, 1888, Alexander S. More, deceased, was the owner in fee-simple and in the possession of several tracts of land lying and being in the county of Ventura, and state of California, and particularly described in an instrument executed between the original plaintiff in this action and defendant on the day and year aforesaid, and acknowledged by the said Alexander S. More, deceased, on the day and year aforesaid, and by the said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.