Schurtz

Schurtz v. Kerkow

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 907·85 Cal. 277·24 P. 609
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 4, 1890No. 13543California756 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is an action to recover for services rendered by plaintiff to defendant as manager of a certain restaurant and saloon, called the Vienna Buffet, under a contract by which plaintiff was to have one half of the net profits, to be computed monthly. The issue was as to the amount of the profits between June 1 and September 1, 1888. Such amount was found to be $2,550.55, for one half of which, less certain payments, plaintiff had judgment. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

*278 1. The principal evidence for plaintiff, aside from parts of a cash-book, consisted of the testimony of one Blackman. He testified that he was an expert accountant; that he made an examination of the books of the Vienna Buffet; and that the examination showed the net profits of the business from June 1st to August 11th to be $2,262.90. Upon cross-examination, he said that, with the exception of some of the items in the cashbook, he did not personally examine the books; that his partner made the detailed examination of the books and furnished the figures from which he (the witness) made the calculations; and that he had full confidence in the ability and honesty of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.