Alpers

Alpers v. Hunt

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 977·86 Cal. 78·9 L.R.A. 483·24 P. 846
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1890No. 12801California3,898 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thornton, J.

— This is an action brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of William L. Bolte, against John Hunt, executor of the last will and testament of George F. Sharp, to recover a sum of money claimed to be due on a contract alleged to have been made by Sharp and J. C. McCeney with plaintiff’s assignor. On the trial verdict and judgment passed for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, which was granted, and from the order granting the motion plaintiff appealed.

The main question to be determined herein arises on the complaint. The averments of the complaint set forth that, prior to the first day of August, 1878, George F. Sharp and Julius 0. McCeney were attorneys at law, *80 practicing their profession in the city and county of San Francisco; that in August, 1878, Mrs. Volina E. Harrigan was the owner of and claimed an interest in the estate of Eliza Haskell, deceased, which claim was contested by other persons, and required the services of attorneys at law for its enforcement; that, about the time last mentioned, Sharp and McOeney agreed with one William L. Bolte, that if he, Bolte, would procure Mrs. Harrigan to employ them as attorneys at law in the matter of her interest and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.