Williard

Williard v. Dillard

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 992·86 Cal. 154·24 P. 940
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 15, 1890No. 20692California849 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fox, J.

— Application for a peremptory writ of mandate requiring the respondent, judge of the superior court of the county of Santa Barbara, to settle and certify a bill of exceptions in a criminal case tried in said court. By way of return to the alternative writ, two papers are presented on behalf of respondent; one in the nature of a demurrer to the petition, and the other an answer. By the paper styled a “demurrer,” exception is taken to the sufficiency of the petition, for that it does not sufficiently appear therefrom that the respondent is the judge before whom the criminal case referred to was tried, or who heard and determined the motion for new trial therein. It would perhaps have been better if the petition had specifically stated that fact; but it does not state that the respondent is the judge of that superior court. This court will take judicial notice of that fact, and also of the fact that he is the only judge of that court. The petition also shows that the criminal case was prosecuted in that court; that a trial has been had, verdict rendered, and judgment pronounced, and motion for new trial made and denied. When we look into the balance of the return,—for it is *156 all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.