Burleson

Burleson v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1030·86 Cal. 342·24 P. 1064
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1890No. 12924California1,659 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

— On the third day of March, 1885, the respondent, an insurance company, entered into a contract with one Abbott, by which it appointed said Abbott its agent in the state of California, and agreed to pay him certain commissions on premiums collected on insurance business done by him, and seven and one half per cent commissions on renewal premiums obtained, under a certain contract of the respondent and certain other agents, and under the contract with Abbott. This commission on renewal premiums was to be paid “while he retained the agency, and no longer.” In consideration of the payment of these commissions, the agent stipulated to “ devote his entire time, energy, and ability to soliciting applications, collecting premiums, and otherwise promoting the interests of the company,” and bound himself to make reports each month of the business, and pay to the respondent all moneys by him collected up to the time of making such report, less his commissions.

The contract provided that it should terminate on the first day of June, 1892, unless sooner terminated by the company, through its proper officers, for a failure or neglect of the agent to keep and perform any of the stipulations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.