Foltz
Foltz v. Cogswell
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1064·86 Cal. 542·25 P. 60
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 29, 1890No. 12787California70 words
Lead Opinion
Works, J.
— This cause was submitted in Department Two, and the following opinion prepared by Gibson, 0.: —
. Subsequently the case was ordered into Bank, and the same has been orally argued and resubmitted.
*552 Having given the case this further consideration, we are satisfied with the opinion of the learned commis-. sioner and the conclusion reached therein.
Judgment affirmed.
Sharpstein, J., Fox, J., Paterson, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.