McMenomy

McMenomy v. Baud

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1108·87 Cal. 134·26 P. 795
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1890No. 12759California1,159 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The plaintiff and defendant are coterminous owners of lots of 27-¡- feet front on Fulton Street, in San Francisco, and running back 120 feet, to Ash *135 Avenue. Each, with his family, resided on his lot, there being an open space of only five to six inches between their houses. The defendant operated a small brass-foundry on the first or ground floor of his house, with machinery incidental thereto, propelled by a small steam-engine having a cylinder of six inches diameter and seven inches stroke. The principal machinery consisted of turning-lathes for turning and polishing brass. The objects of this suit are to enjoin the operating and use of the foundry and machinery, on the ground that they are a nuisance to plaintiff, and to recover two thousand dollars damages. The allegations of the complaint in regard to the nuisance are as follows: —

The answer denies that the operating of the foundry and machinery is or ever was a nuisance; and denies all averments tending to prove the nuisance.

As to the alleged nuisance and damage, the court found the following facts: —

As a condition of denying defendant’s motion for new trial, the damages were reduced to twelve hundred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.