Yarnell

Yarnell v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
87 Cal. 603·25 P. 767
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 1891No. 13920California1,863 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is an action brought by a resident, and tax-payer, against the city of Los Angeles, M. D. Johnson, treasurer of said city, and the City Bank, a private corporation. The purpose of the action is to enjoin the said treasurer from depositing the public moneys of the city with said bank pursuant to a certain contract between the city and the bank. Defendants filed a general demurrer “that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” An answer and supplemental answer were filed, together with some affidavits, and the case was submitted. Subsequently, the court rendered judgment, by which it was “ ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the demurrer to the complaint be sustained”; that plaintiff was not entitled to the injunction; that the order to show cause be discharged, and the action dismissed; and that defendants recover their costs. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and it is clear that the appeal turns upon the sufficiency of the complaint, and the correctness of the decision of the court upon the demurrer. Upon the face of the complaint appear the following facts: —

The city of Los Angeles is a municipal corporation existing under what…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.