Blumenthal

Blumenthal v. Goodall

Good Law
1891 Cal. LEXIS 806·89 Cal. 251·26 P. 906
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 27, 1891No. 12638California1,670 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

This cause has been heard in Department and in Bank, and is now before the court in Bank for decision upon an order granting a rehearing.

This is an action for the recovery of commissions claimed to have been earned by a real estate agent in the sale of certain lands belonging to defendant. Judg-J ment for defendant; motion for new trial denied; and] appeal from both judgment and order.

The court found that the defendant, being the owner of the land in question, on the thirteenth day of July, 1887, gave to L. Oesterreicher, a real estate agent, an authorization in writing, of which the following is a copy: “ I hereby authorize Mr. L. Oesterreicher to sell blocks 899, 900, 901, 903, outside lands, for the sum of fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) each; will allow him one hundred dollars ($100) as commissions for his services on each block. This contract to be in force for ten days from date hereof.” Which paper was duly dated and signed by defendant.

The court further finds that on the same day Oesterreicher agreed with one Fulda, orally, for the sale of the blocks at the price named, but Fulda failing to put his agreemnet in writing, Oesterreicher afterwards, and on the same day,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.