Branham

The plaintiff, claiming to be the owner and in the possession of certain church property consisting of real estate, the church building situate thereon, and personal property used therein and belonging thereto, brought this action to restrain the defendants from interfering with said property, and to quiet its title thereto against said defendants, other than the said Branham, sheriff of Santa Clara County.

The defendants deny that the plaintiff is a corporation, and also deny that the plaintiff is seised and possessed of the property.

Judgment in the trial court went for the plaintiff; and this is an appeal from an order denying defendants' motion for a new trial.

The motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Appellant relies upon two propositions to sustain his position: 1. That the plaintiff has no legal existence as a corporation; 2. That it is not seised and possessed of the property involved in this litigation.

As far as the present proceeding is concerned, it is immaterial whether the plaintiff is a corporation de jure, or not. It is at least a corporation de facto, and as such its trustees can maintain suits in its corporate name, until its existence is…