Gill

Gill v. Driver

Good Law
1891 Cal. LEXIS 884·90 Cal. 72·27 P. 64
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 30, 1891No. 13204California598 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

— This is an action to recover the possession of certain personal property, or its value, alleged to be one thousand dollars, and damages for its detention. The complaint is in the usual form in such cases.

The defendants, by their answer, deny all the averments of the complaint, and allege that at the time of the commencement of the action, and at all times since, they were and have been the owners and entitled to the possession of the property described in the complaint; that the value of the property was one thousand dollars; and while the defendants were the owners and entitled to the possession thereof, the plaintiff, under and by virtue of the proceedings in this case, unlawfully and without their consent took the property from their possession, and has ever since detained the same, to their damage in the sum of ten dollars per day.

The case was tried by the court, and judgment given for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals, without any statement or bill of exceptions.

The court found certain probative facts, and then found as follows: “ 6. That plaintiff was not at the time of the commencement of this action the owner nor entitled to the possession of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.