San Bernardino National Bank v. Colton Land & Water Co.

Good Law
91 Cal. 124·27 P. 538
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 1891No. 14330California920 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

This action is brought to recover on a promissory note for two thousand five hundred dollars, executed by the defendants to the Farmers’ Exchange Bank, a corporation, and by it indorsed to plaintiff after maturity. The note, which is joint and several, is dated July 28, 1887, and is signed by the defendants in the *126 following order: “Colton Land and Water Company, by A. B. Hotchkiss, President; J. C. Peacock, A. B. Hotchkiss.”

The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled.

The Colton Land and Water Company alone answered, alleging that it was merely an accommodation maker; that such execution of the note was in excess of its corporate authority; and that the plaintiff and its assignor had knowledge of the fact at the time of the execution and transfer of the note.

Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and the defendants the Colton Land and Water Company and A. B. Hotchkiss appealed from the judgment. Subsequently, an appeal was taken by the defendant corporation from the order refusing a new trial, but it is stipulated that both appeals be heard as one upon the same transcript.

It appears that the note sued on was made by the defendant corporation in pursuance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.