Kirman

Kirman v. Hunnewill

Good Law
1891 Cal. LEXIS 1065·91 Cal. 157·27 P. 587
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 1891No. 14463California88 words

Lead Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal.

The judgment in this cause was entered November 2, 1888, and the appeal therefrom was not.taken until more than one year thereafter; viz., December 8, 1890. The motion to dismiss the appeal therefrom must therefore be granted.

Whether the appellants are entitled to have the execution of the judgment stayed until the determination of the appeal from the order denying a new trial cannot be considered upon this motion. (See Fulton v. Hanna, 40 Cal. 278 .)

The appeal from the judgment is dismissed.