Kiessig

Kiessig v. Allspaugh

Good Law
13 L.R.A. 418·1891 Cal. LEXIS 1075·91 Cal. 231·27 P. 655
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 1891No. 14405California743 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haven, J.

The defendant Lundeen was a surety for his co-defendants, Allspaugh and Hall, upon a bond executed to plaintiff to indemnify ail'd save him harmless against any claims or liens for material or labor used or employed by his principals in the construction of a building which they had theretofore contracted to erect for plaintiff. The contract price for the construction of the building was eight thousand dollars, and by the terms of the building contract the plaintiff was authorized to retain one fourth of that sum in his hands until final settlement between the parties thereto. The complaint alleges “that after the time said house had been finished, and when final settlement was made-as per contract aforesaid, there were good and valid claims and demands and liens for material and labor expended and used in the building, construction, and finishing said house, in excess of the contract price of said building, to the amount of $1,817.25”; and that by reason of the failure of the contractors to discharge them the plaintiff was compelled to pay the same after having paid the full contract price for the house.

This action is brought against the principals and sureties on the bond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.