Lataillade

Lataillade v. Oreña

Good Law
1891 Cal. LEXIS 1134·91 Cal. 565·27 P. 924
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1891No. 13975California2,660 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to obtain an accounting, and the appeal is from a judgment entered against him after demurrer sustained to his third amended complaint.

The facts stated in the complaint are, in substance, as follows: —

On the twelfth day of April, 1849, Csesario Lataillade, *573 plaintiff’s father, died intestate, in the town of Santa Barbara, where he was residing, leaving a widow and three minor children, of whom plaintiff, who was born December 2, 1849, was one.

After his marriage to plaintiff’s mother, the decedent purchased two ranchos situated in what is. now the county of Santa Barbara, and paid for them with his own funds; but at his request, the conveyances were executed to his wife as grantee, and were accepted by her for the benefit of her husband, and thereafter the ranchos were owned and possessed as the community property of the two. At the time of his death the decedent was also the owner of a large number of cattle then grazing upon the ranchos. For several years prior to 1849, defendant had the care and management of the ranchos and cattle as the agent of the decedent, and afterwards, with the consent of plaintiff’s mother, he continued to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.