Richards

Richards v. Griffith

Good Law
1891 Cal. LEXIS 1238·92 Cal. 493·28 P. 484
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 29, 1891No. 14096California734 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Paterson, J.

The court below sustained the demurrer to the complaint, and plaintiff having declined to amend, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants.

It is alleged in the complaint that on November 11, 1884, defendant Bunnel made and delivered to Charles St. Sure a promissory note for the sum of $700, payable November 11, 1886, and to secure payment thereof executed and delivered to him a mortgage on certain lands, which are described; that on August 25, 1886, the defendants Griffith & Stose recovered and caused to be docketed a judgment against said Bunnel for the sum of $303.26; that on October 21, 1886, Bunnel made and delivered to plaintiff his promissory note for the sum of $1,200, payable two years after date, and to secure payment thereof he executed and delivered to plaintiff a mortgage on the same property owned by him and described in the St. Sure mortgage; that plaintiff made the loan of $1,200 to Bunnel upon the express agreement with the latter that the St. Sure mortgage should be satisfied and discharged by said Bunnel out of the sum loaned to him by plaintiff; that thereupon the plaintiff paid St. Sure the amount due on the note which he held against Bunnel ($904.16),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.