Lewis

Lewis v. Rothchild

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 769·92 Cal. 625·28 P. 805
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 1892No. 13678California1,238 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

Appeal from a judgment in an action brought to recover from the defendant the sum of $350, alleged to have been deposited by plaintiff with defendant, on the purchase by plaintiff of defendant of certain real estate described in the complaint. The written contract of purchase is copied into the complaint, and it stipulates that said deposit shall be returned to plaintiff if any valid liens for taxes be found to exist upon said premises, unless removed within five days after plaintiff shall give defendant notice, in writing, of the existence thereof.

Plaintiff alleges that during the fiscal years 1878-79, *628 and for many years prior thereto, one H. Cummings was the owner of said premises, and was assessed for said fiscal years, for his personal property situated in the city and county of San Francisco, $7.30 for state, city, and county purposes, which plaintiff alleges have not been paid, and constitute a valid lien upon said premises; and plaintiff further alleges that one Elizabeth Mitchell was the owner of said premises during the fiscal years 1884-85, and for many years prior thereto, and that she was assessed for said fiscal years, for her personal property situated in said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.