Hurlbutt

Hurlbutt v. N. W. Spaulding Saw Co.

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 518·93 Cal. 55·28 P. 795
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1892No. 14175California674 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover judgment for moneys alleged to have been paid out and expended by them at the special instance and request of the defendants, and under and in pursuance of a written contract made by the parties. A copy of the contract is set out in the complaint, and its execution is not denied.

*57 The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment given for the plaintiffs. From that judgment the defendants appealed, and have brought the case here on a bill of exceptions.

1. It is claimed for appellants that the plaintiffs have mistaken their remedy; that the action should have been for an accounting, and not in assumpsit

The moneys sought to be recovered were expended by plaintiffs in taking charge of and operating a saw-mill; and they alleged that after applying all the proceeds of the business and all payments made, to the discharge of their claim, the sum for which judgment was asked remained due and unpaid, though payment thereof had been demanded. The court found that certain other sums should be deducted from the amount claimed, but that the balance remaining was due and owing by the defendants, and plaintiffs were entitled to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.