Priet

Priet v. Reis

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 523·93 Cal. 85·28 P. 798
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1892No. 14043California1,179 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, as treasurer of the .city and county of San Francisco, to pay a warrant for damages, under the act of the legislature for widening of Dupont Street.

That act (Stats. 1875-76, p. 439) provided for the sale of bonds, and that the proceeds should be held to pay expenses and damages awarded to property-holders.

In case of a dispute as to whom the damages should be paid, the commissioners were to place a warrant for the amount in the hands of the clerk, and the claimants could sue the treasurer, joining other claimants; and the treasurer was to pay in accordance with the determination.

Among the awards was that mentioned in the complaint, for $10,932, the warrant for which was deposited with the county clerk because the claimants could not agree.

Judgment was entered in a suit to determine the rights of the claimants in 1883.

Section 9 of the act provides for the payment of the money realized from the sale of the bonds to the treasurer, to be devoted to paying expenses and damages; the fund to be called the “ Dupont Street fund.”

Section 13 provides for the levying of a tax, and that “when collected the said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.