Worn

Smith v. Worn

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 546·93 Cal. 206·28 P. 944
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 1892No. 13653California2,001 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Paterson, J.

On September 14, 1871, David Porter conveyed to Sidney V. Smith, the father of plaintiff, a tract of land described in the first paragraph of the complaint. The'deed contained this clause: —

Porter, in 1872, conveyed the remainder of his ranch to one Walker by deed, which contained a stipulation to the effect that the land therein described was conveyed subject to the right of way over it created by the deed from Porter to Smith; and in 1874, Walker conveyed the same land to Annie S. E. Worn by deed, which contained a similar clause. In 1881, said Annie laid out the property into blocks and lots for the purposes of an auction sale, and filed a map thereof in the recorder’s office, showing an avenue, called Linda Vista Avenue, sixty-six feet wide, on the line of the right of way named in the deed from Porter to Smith, and thereafter she conveyed the tract to appellant by a deed which included the strip in question. Smith, Sen., conveyed to plaintiff on January, 13, 1880, referring, in the deed, to the road sixty-six feet wide described in the deed from Porter. All of the deeds referred to were recorded, respectively, soon after they were executed. At the time Smith received his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.