Welch

Welch v. Mohr

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 565·93 Cal. 371·28 P. 1060
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 1892No. 12710California335 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the loss of a horse hired by plaintiff to the defendant, and alleged to have been driven by him several miles beyond the place to which he had promised to go, and while being so driven by the- defendant the horse died.

The defendant answered by a general denial. The case was tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for defendant for costs.

The case comes here by appeal from the judgment and the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The only question presented for decision by this appeal is, whether the horse and buggy were let to the defendant by plaintiff to be driven to a specified place *372 and return. If so, and the horse was a riven to a point beyond that place, such driving was in violation of the bailment and an unlawful conversion, and defendant’s failure to return the horse would entitle the plaintiff to recover the value thereof in damages.

It is claimed by appellant, who, it appears, was a livery-man having horses and vehicles to let for hire, that the letting was to drive the horse to Mountain View and return, and no farther, and that, in violation of the terms of the contract, defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.