Turnbull

People v. Turnbull

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 616·93 Cal. 630·29 P. 224
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 17, 1892No. 20838California490 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal by the people from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment. The *631 indictment is based upon an alleged violation of section 165 of the Penal Code, which reads as follows: —

The defendant, by the indictment, is charged with offering a bribe “to one E. E. Giddings, a member of the board of directors of a corporation, to wit, Alta Irrigation District, with intent to corruptly influence,” etc. It is insisted that the words “member of aboard of trustees of a corporation ” are not broad enough to include a member of a board of directors of a corporation. Section 4 of the Penal Code reads: —

Section 958 of the Penal Code is as follows: —

Construed in the light of the foregoing provisions of the statute, it necessarily follows that in the use of the word “trustee,” in said section the legislature intended that it should be applied in it widest and broadest sense. In Farmers’ Bank v. Downey, 53 Cal. 468 , 31 Am Rep. 62, it was decided that the directors of a corporation were its trustees, and the decision is supported by abundant authority. It is insisted that the word “ corporation,” as used in the section, has no reference to private corporations, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.