Kauffman

Kauffman v. Maier

Good Law
18 L.R.A. 124·1892 Cal. LEXIS 674·94 Cal. 269·29 P. 481
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 2, 1892No. 14571California3,486 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from their negligence. He was in their employ at the time of the injury, and the negligence charged upon them was their permitting the shaft of a wheel to protrude into the room where he was at work, by reason of which his sleeve was caught upon the jagged end of the shaft, causing him to be carried around it, whereby his arm was so injured as to require amputation. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the court below, and a new trial was granted upon the motion of the defendants, and from this order the plaintiff has appealed. In their statement upon the motion for a new trial, the defendants have assigned various errors of law on the part of the court, as well as many particulars in which the evidence is claimed to be insufficient.

1. In its order granting a new trial, the court included the following as a part thereof, viz.: “ The new trial is hereby granted upon the following ground specifically, and upon no other ground or grounds, no error being by this court deemed to have occurred at the trial on account whereof a new trial should be granted to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.