Steinhart

Steinhart v. National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co.

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 692·94 Cal. 362·29 P. 717
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 27, 1892No. 14502California1,471 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $860, money alleged to have been received by the defendant to and for the use of the plaintiffs. The court below gave judgment for the defendant, from which, and from an order refusing a new trial, the plaintiffs appeal.

*364 The facts of the case, as found by the court, are as follows: —

On the seventeenth day of December, 1888, one G. Politz made his promissory note to the plaintiffs for $860, payable two months after date at the bank of defendant. They delivered it to the London, Paris, and American Bank of San Francisco for collection, which bank forwarded it to the defendant at Sacramento to be presented for payment, and it was received Sunday, the seventeenth day of February, 1889. The maker was a customer of the defendant, and on the morning of the 18th he deposited with the defendant four hundred dollars on general account. While he was at the bank, at the time he made the deposit, a clerk of the defendant presented the note for payment. The maker wrote across the face of the note, “ Please charge the same to my account. G. Politz.” The clerk then wrote on the back of the note, “Charged account. Littlefield.” The clerk,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.