Forsyth

Forsyth v. Dunnagan

Good Law
94 Cal. 438·29 P. 770
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 5, 1892No. 14121California1,204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beatty, J.

This is an action to enjoin the defendants— the members of the board of supervisors and a district road-master of Fresno County— from opening a road through the land of the plaintiff.

By the judgment of the superior court a temporary injunction was made perpetual, and defendants appeal from the judgment, and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

There is but little controversy as to the facts of the case. It appears that in the year 1878, F. Roeding was the owner of section 32 of a certain township in Fresno County. In conjunction with the owners of the adjoining sections, 31 and 32, he caused to be made and recorded a map of the entire tract, by which it was subdivided into twenty-acre lots, with streets and roads extending through it north and south, and east and west. On this plat or map so recorded, the tract was designated as the “ Nevada Colony,” and the design was to sell the lots to settlers. Besides marking and recording the map, the owners caused ditches to be dug on each side of the *440 streets as surveyed, thus marking their location on the ground, and in January, 1879, they united in a deed to the county of Fresno, by which they conveyed the roads so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.