Cox

De Courcey v. Cox

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 742·94 Cal. 665·30 P. 95
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 14, 1892No. 14618California848 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant for false imprisonment. The complaint was demurred to on two grounds, one of which was, that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, and defendant filed his answer to the complaint. After-wards, defendant gave plaintiff notice of a motion for judgment in favor of defendant upon the pleadings, which was granted, and a judgment was entered in favor of defendant for his costs and disbursements. From that judgment plaintiff has appealed.

If the complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the court undoubtedly erred in granting defendant’s motion for judgment upon the pleadings. *668 The complaint states that upon a complaint made before defendant, a justice of the peace, charging plaintiff with refusing to return the sum of twenty dollars, alleged to have been overpaid said plaintiff by mistake by the El Cajon Vineyard Company, defendant issued a warrant of arrest, upon which plaintiff was arrested and brought before defendant, and required to and did plead to said charge, and after trial defendant rendered a judgment that plaintiff restore said amount…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.