Joyce

Joyce v. White

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 807·95 Cal. 236·30 P. 524
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 9, 1892No. 14657California356 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

The defendant, having a contract with the superintendent of streets in the city of Los Angeles, to construct a sewer with manholes and flush-tanks through certain streets in that city, entered into a written contract with the plaintiff, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed to construct all the manholes and flush-tanks required in connection with the sewer, according to the specifications contained in defendant’s contract with the superintendent of streets, at such time as the defendant might direct, so as not to delay the work of constructing the sewer; to furnish all the material therefor; to do the work subject to the inspection and directions of the superintendent of streets as to manner and materials; and to complete the work in such condition that it would be accepted by the superintendent of streets. The defendant agreed to pay per each manhole and flush-tank $38.50, when the same should *238 be accepted, and a sufficient amount collected from the property owners for that purpose.

The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that after constructing a certain number of manholes and flush-tanks, according to the contract, and while he was proceeding to perform the contract on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.