Ying

Ying v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
931 F.2d 899
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 199136-3_1California1,418 words

Opinion

Opinion

931 F.2d 899 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roderick Donald YING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 90-70391. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 29, 1991. * Decided May 1, 1991. Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roderick Donald Ying, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision dismissing his appeal and affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") order of deportation. 3 Ying contends that (1) his due process rights to a fair trial were denied because he was mentally incompetent during his deportation hearings, (2) he is entitled to amnesty under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA"), (3) he is entitled to relief from deportation under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (f), and (4) he is entitled to voluntary departure under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (e).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.