Beall

Beall v. Fisher

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 866·95 Cal. 568·30 P. 773
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 9, 1892No. 14776California907 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

On May 12, 1890, plaintiff was the owner of 320 acres of land situated in the county of Fresno, subject to a mortgage to secure his debt to the mortgagee, then amounting — principal and interest — to about $5,700. At the same time defendant owned 1,010 acres of land situated in Tulare County, subject to *569 a mortgage to secure his debt for the principal sum of $6,060, on which had then accrued about $118 interest.

On that day verbal negotiations were commenced between plaintiff and defendant for an exchange of their lands, and proceeded so far that they supposed they understood each other as to the terms upon which the exchange was to be made. About ten days thereafter (May 22d), they met at the office of Mr. L. L. Cory, an attorney at law and notary public, for the purpose of executing the deeds and other writings necessary to effect the exchange. Nothing of their previous negotiations had been reduced to writing. Mr. Cory drew the deeds and other papers, which were then executed, consisting of a deed from plaintiff to defendant of the land in Fresno County, subject to the mortgage above mentioned, which mortgage the defendant by the terms of the deed assumed and agreed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.