Gutzeil

Gutzeil v. Pennie

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 871·95 Cal. 598·30 P. 836
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 12, 1892No. 15004California688 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haven, J.

The undertaking on appeal herein was executed by the American Surety Company, a foreign corporation, and the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the undertaking is not properly signed, and upon the further ground that the corporation has not filed with the secretary of state a designation of some person residing in this state upon whom service of summons may be made, as required by the act relating to foreign corporations, approved April 1, 1872. (Stats. 1871-72, p. 826.)

1. The undertaking is signed in behalf of the corporation surety by its second vice-president and its assistant secretary, and has affixed to it the seal of the corporation. There is nothing before us to show that these, officers were not authorized to sign and deliver the undertaking, and we cannot, therefore, hold that the undertaking is void because not properly signed.

2. The corporation has never filed with the secretary of state a paper designating the person upon whom service of process can be made for it in this state, as required by the act of the legislature above referred to; but it appears from the certificate of the insurance commissioner for this state that “the American…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.