Clark v. Austin

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 944·96 Cal. 283·31 P. 293
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 3, 1892No. 14891California746 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

— Action to foreclose a mortgage. The defendants Austin, E. K. Clarke, and Bruce Oavitt were jointly liable to the plaintiffs for the mortgage debt, but as between each other, Austin was bound to pay only one half, Clarke one third, and Oavitt one sixth. Before judgment, Clarke paid his portion, — one third of the debt, viz., $4,065,—and a decree, of foreclosure passed for the unpaid portion of the debt, ordering a sale of the mortgaged premises, and that a joint judgment be docketed against Austin, Clarke, and Oavitt for any deficiency of proceeds of sale to pay the debt. The sheriff sold the mortgaged property and returned a deficiency of $7,913, for which a judgment was docketed as per order of the court. It appears that on May 12, 1891, Clarke paid $4,025.60 of this judgment, in addition to his payment of one third of the whole debt before judgment, and, also, that full satisfaction of the judgment was entered on the same day, but it does not appear when or by whom the balance of the judgment was paid.

Clarke claimed the benefit of the judgment to enforce contribution or repayment from Austin to him of the full sum — $4,025.60 — paid by him on the judgment, under section 709…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.