Contest of Probate of Will — Appeal from Order Denying New Trial. — Where there has been a regular contest over the probate of a will, an appeal lies from an order denying a motion for a new trial of the contest.

Appeal — Errors without Prejudice. — The judgment will not be reversed upon appeal because of errors occurring during the progress of the trial, where it appears that the judgment could not have been different had the errors not been committed.

Will—Rights of Testator — Unreasonable Provisions. —The right of a testator to dispose of his estate depends neither on the justice of his prejudice nor the soundness of his reasoning. He may do what he will with his own; and if there be no defect of testamentary capacity, and no undue influence or fraud, the law gives effect to his will, though its provisions are unreasonable and unjust.

Id.—Evidence — Mental Capacity of Testator — Caprioiousness — Spiritualism. — Capricious and arbitrary likes and dislikes are not evidences of insanity, nor does evidence that a testatrix was a spiritualist constitute any proof that she was insane, especially where it does not appear that any views she may have had on the subject of spiritualism had anything to do with the making of her will.

Id.—Trial of Contest —Errors without Prejudice.—The action of the trial court will not be reversed for alleged errors of law committed during the trial of the contest of a will, where it appears that no prejudice could have resulted to the appellant.

Id. —Charge to Jury — Quotations from Decisions. —It is not error for the trial court, in charging the jury, to quote from decisions of courts in other cases, if the quotations correctly state the law.

Id. — Charge as to Absence of Counter-evidence — Harmless Error. — In a contest over the probate of a will, where the execution of the will is fully and clearly proven, and there is no evidence to the contrary, a charge to the jury that there is no evidence tending to show that the will was not executed and attested according to law is not prejudicial error, even if it be construed as a charge upon a matter of fact.