Gutzeit

Gutzeit v. Pennie

Good Law
1893 Cal. LEXIS 575·97 Cal. 484·32 P. 584
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1893No. 15261California1,684 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Motion for a writ of supersedeas.

The plaintiff brought this action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by one Palmer upon certain lands in Santa Clara County. After the execution of the mortgage, Palmer conveyed the property, and thereafter died. The defendants in the action are persons who have acquired an interest in the mortgaged premises under Palmer subsequent to the date of the mortgage. Palmer’s grantee made an agreement with the appellant, Radovich, for a conveyance of a portion of the mortgaged premises, under which Radovich entered into possession, and thereafter made a mortgage of said premises to the respondent, Chielovich. Chielovich, in addition to his answer to the plaintiff’s complaint, set up this mortgage by way of a cross-complaint against Radovich, and issue was joined thereon by Radovich. The court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of his claim and for a sale of the prerm ises, and also in favor of Chielovich for the amount of *486 his claim against Radovich, and directed that out of the proceeds of said sale the sheriff, after paying the claims of the plaintiff and certain other prior liens, — amounting in the aggregate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.